This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Copy-editing--Rewrite; 17 May 2010: for following reasons: 1) corrected the mixing of 'past' and 'present' tenses within article paragraphs; >>applied the 'present' tense--the norm for reporting a novel's story-line. 2) corrected for fact, spelling, punctuation and syntax; and revised for current English terminology (or for terms from-the-novel) as appropriate. 3) removed (internal) cites to novel; these aren't needed--which is the norm, except for an unusual issue calling for a cite to clarify. 4) word-smithing for improved readability.--Jbeans (talk) 10:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I am in the process of rewriting this article as there are numerous issues. I will attempt to retain as much of the existing structure and material as possible out of respect for those who, some years ago, got it to this stage. Currently, it is still very uneven. I will comment here further when there is sufficient foundation for building a more robust article.Petrosbizar (talk) 23:21, 17 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
The article is now more balanced. It cites a reasonable number of reliable sources and deals with a number of critical issues raised by the novel in so far as they relate to Mary Crawford. I will continue its development in relation to the Mansfield Park group.Petrosbizar (talk) 14:37, 24 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}