 | This page was proposed for deletion by Heyoostorm (talk · contribs) in the past. It was contested by Phil Bridger (talk · contribs) on October 16, 2020 with the comment: passes WP:PROF#C5 and is not overly promotional |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mark J. Rozell article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Conflict of interest edit
At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting {{request edit}} (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted.
Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Deletion edit
Normally I support keeping the majority of Wikipedia articles, despite any POV issues they may have, but I think it's necessary in this case. The main contributors to the article appear to be paid or connected to the subject, and have repeatedly added material with a potential bias. Many references are indeed from reputable sources, but don't add anything to the article's main points and sections, which are just puffery of its subject. I think articles like this are a "gateway" to further COI in the project. User:Heyoostorm_talk! 19:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)