Talk:Mark Forstater
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 28 May 2019. The result of the discussion was withdrawn. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
It seems to me that this person is notable, in an encyclopedic sense, only as relates to the lawsuit pertaining to Spamalot. The fact that his "notability" is self-referenced in the first sentence seems to be begging the question. (Or at worst, self-promotional...those nonfiction works do not appear to be notable either.) 69.203.99.225 (talk) 07:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
He is bankrupt? https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/2608083 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.131.167.100 (talk) 08:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Possible COI editing edit
Hi User:Cforstater, thank you for your contributions to this article. From your username, would I be incorrect in assuming that you are related to the subject of this article? If so, you may wish to review WP:COI. If not, disregard this message. RexSueciae (talk) 20:09, 28 January 2023 (UTC)