Talk:Marginal likelihood

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AVM2019 in topic Frequentist marginal likelihood

I wanted to learn from this page. Very puzzling: In the Concepts section there are equations including but nowhere it is defined, discussed or explained. --Janlo (talk) 10:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Gibbs sampling is a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. As a consequence, the last sentence may need a reformulation.

x isn't defined in the first equation, nor is the use of the semicolon - I can't find another Wikipedia page on probability that uses the semicolon in this context. See [1] for a more detailed explanation.

Dr. Zhang's comment on this article edit

Dr. Zhang has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:


It is very good.


We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

Dr. Zhang has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:


  • Reference : Song Li & Mervyn J. Silvapulle & Param Silvapulle & Xibin Zhang, 2012. "Bayesian Approaches to Non-parametric Estimation of Densities on the Unit Interval," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 3/12, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 16:25, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Frequentist marginal likelihood edit

The following passage is problematic, because it suggests that a distribution can be given for a parameter in frequentist statistics, which is not the case:

In classical (frequentist) statistics, the concept of marginal likelihood occurs instead in the context of a joint parameter  , where   is the actual parameter of interest, and   is a non-interesting nuisance parameter. If there exists a probability distribution for  , it is often desirable to consider the likelihood function only in terms of  , by marginalizing out  :  

AVM2019 (talk) 17:56, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

On a related note, "marginal likelihood" means a different thing in frequentist statistics, which has to do with likelihood factorisation (google "conditional likelihood"), not integration with respect to a prior. I see in the edit history that early versions of the article made it clear that it is about the Bayesian concept. Later, someone with more confidence than knowledge came and said, I quote, "this is the same concept in frequentist and bayesian statistics", link to the edit. This is why we are having a mess right now. AVM2019 (talk) 18:25, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply