Talk:Marcus Caeionius Silvanus

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

About removed material edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A now-banned editor had the distressing practice of creating articles comprised of genealogical statements that he attributed to the research of Christian Settipani, citing the entire book not specific pages. Since not everyone can read French, & fewer have access to any of Settipani's books, these statements had been allowed to stand on en.wikipedia for a few years. Then I came along & tried to confirm these statements in one or two ways: either there is evidence that someone might argue these genealogical relationships are possible; or that Settipani had actually made them, & provided a page &/or footnote where he had written the words. Every time this now-banned editor cited Settipani for some assertion, it turns out that either no one ever proposed such a relationship, or that the evidence prevents the proposed reconstruction. The phrase "he made shit up" comes to mind concerning this situation.

As a result, I have removed all of the content previously sourced to Settipani in this characteristic vague style that could not be verified by other reliable sources, such as Ronald Syme & Werner Eck. From examining the fr.wikipedia article on Silvanus, it appears that Settipani actually made one assertion about him, which I kept in this article out of an attempt to be fair. Further, some related articles, such as Marcus Caeionius Proculus, should be carefully examined, &, if no reliable information can be found in them, deleted. -- llywrch (talk) 07:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic