Talk:March of the Pigs

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Fastest BPM? edit

"This video was the last video to be played on MTV2's Increase the Beat, on Memorial Day weekend 2002, being that it had the fastest BPM of the 400+ videos that were played that weekend."

Did it beat Monkey Drummer?

Do you have any statistics on "Monkey Drummer"? -heroicraptor

refrences edit

? Kas0809 (talk) 22:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:March of the pigs UK 1.jpg edit

 

Image:March of the pigs UK 1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:March of the pigs UK 2.jpg edit

 

Image:March of the pigs UK 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:March of the pigs.jpg edit

 

Image:March of the pigs.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

"29/8 time" edit

The bulk of the tune sounds like it's just in 7/8 time to me. There are sections that are in 4/4 but it doesn't alternate 3 bars of 7/8 and 1 of 4/4. I'm going to change it unless someone can source it --Frantik (talk) 04:52, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nope. The bulk of the tune is indeed in 7/8 time - except (as was previously noted in the article until you deleted it) for every fourth bar which adds an extra 8th note. It's not just random insertions of a 4/4 bar - it follows a regular pattern: 1 bar of 7/8, 1 bar of 7/8, 1 bar of 7/8, 1 bar of 8/8 (or more simply 4/4); then that same set of 4-bars totalling 29 8th notes, repeated over and over. The article didn't say it was a 29/8 time signature, it said "in effect a 29/8 time signature". And it is - except... the verses actually alternate: the loud, thrashy sections are "29/8", but the quieter sections (beginning with "All the pigs are all lined up" and ending with "Doesn't it make you feel better?") are in straight 4/4. This might be where you're confused. But I think the existing text was a good, clear explanation of the most interesting thing about this song (despite not mentioning the quiet sections in continuous 4/4). Saying "Most of the song is in 7/8 time" is really just dumbing it down and making it both less interesting and less accurate. I'd like to revert it to how it was before, but should we mention the sections of continuous 4/4 too? Lontano (talk) 19:03, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'll take your word for it, though i think we both can agree that it probably falls under original research regardless of what it says ;) --Frantik (talk) 01:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on March of the Pigs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on March of the Pigs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on March of the Pigs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply