This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
https://www.votevets.org/about
Maybe it's semantics, but VoteVets espouses progressivism in their self-description, not liberal. In many contexts, American liberalism and American progressivism is not synonymous. In fact, they are often adversarial in their aims and activities. Changed wording to match, hope it's okay.
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Note on naming: There appear to to be two common names for this group, one with two variations. They are “Mar-A-Lago Crowd,” “Mar-a-Lago Crowd,” and “Mar-a-Lago Three.” Horse Eye Jack (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Horse Eye Jack: That being the case, I used Mar-a-Lago Crowd when accepting this to match our article on Mar-a-Lago. –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 11:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, it is probably best to match the style WP uses already. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 16:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
