Talk:Manningham, Bradford

Bradford High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bradford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bradford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BradfordWikipedia:WikiProject BradfordTemplate:WikiProject BradfordBradford articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Start‑class Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Manningham, Bradford is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

White Abbey, Bradford was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 September 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Manningham, Bradford. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

recent actions by community groups have lessened the prevalence of prostitutes in the area. Excuse me while I gip! Who you kidding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.8.27.125 (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Class Rating edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I really think this article should be downgraded to Stub class for now. I contains no references and very scant details. I have done so in the hope it will be improved.However I think its importance has been underestimated.Kaleeyed (talk) 14:58, 14 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Manningham, Bradford/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires infobox
Requires photographs
Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Requires copy edit for WP:MOS

Keith D (talk) 18:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 18:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 23:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manningham, Bradford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140107003637/http://www.thejc.com/event/b%E2%80%99nai-b%E2%80%99rith-european-days-jewish-culture-heritage-bradford-reform-synagogue to http://www.thejc.com/event/b%E2%80%99nai-b%E2%80%99rith-european-days-jewish-culture-heritage-bradford-reform-synagogue

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply