Talk:Mandschurosaurus

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mandschurosaurus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is sit still a valid taxon edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The website says in 1970s more fossils of M.amurensis had been assigned is that true? Is it still a valid taxon, it had been debated as a dubious taxon by many authors, i don't know where's the holotype then, I hope in 2017 will classify it as a hadrosaur valid taxon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.16.151.155 (talk) 08:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic