Talk:Mamluk dynasty (Delhi)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mamluk dynasty (Delhi) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mamluk Sultanate Cairo edit
Should someone put a 'not to be confused with Mamluk Sultanate Cairo" link here?
Untitled edit
What is the name of Balban's wife
Clarity on Nasiruddin mohammed accession on throne edit
as per your article on alauddin masud, he was succedded nasiruddin. but how can it be possible if he died in 1229 AD i Bengal as per your article on iitutmish?
Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag TALK2ME 15:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Map incorrect edit
The map is grossly incorrect. Nepal was not under Mamluk dynasty ever, neither under Sultanet of Delhi. See History of Nepal for further details.--Eukesh (talk) 07:24, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Role in protection of Islam edit
It is notable that the Mamluk Sultanate in India played an active role in the protection and preservation of Islam as the whole of the middle east was overrun by the Mongols.[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.29.197.13 (talk) 03:24, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
References
This needs some heavy tone checking edit
I'm not an editor so I don't know exactly what to say here, but this definitely needs a warning banner about how it might not have an appropriately encyclopedic tone (and maybe some other warning banners). Talking about Turks being brutish and calling the dynasty the "Slave dynasty" doesn't seem to be handled appropriately. 173.29.22.129 (talk) 02:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Missing wikilink edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This article is missing a wikilink to Indian campaigns of Muhammad of Ghor, which has important background information directly relevant to this article, as the actions taken by Mohammad of Ghor are foundational to the creation of this dynasty. If it is not immediately obvious where to put it in the text, it could start as a "See also" section entry. --174.17.171.14 (talk) 05:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Semi-done, put in See Also section. Cheers! Cocobb8 (💬 talk to me! • ✏️ my contributions) 17:13, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
