Talk:Malaysian Pontoon

Gambling Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Board and table games Low‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Malaysia Low‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from Federal Pontoon was copied or moved into Pontoon (card game) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from Jupiters 21 was copied or moved into Pontoon (card game) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from Treasury 21 was copied or moved into Pontoon (card game) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Untitled edit

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Opening comment edit

Aecis:

Original research? "Beating Pontoon" is not a first publication of original research. The section was taken out of a book that is in print. In addition, other authors (Frank Scoblete, Wild Bill at BJ21.com) discuss exactly the same thing and arrive at the same conclusions. I suggest that you go out and familiarise yourself with the literature before you draw conclusions on whether a page publishes original research. Most Wikipedia content was original research, once upon a time. The question is whether or not Wikipedia is the first publication of the research. If it is not, it is no longer defined as "original research." When it comes to games involving money, the first thing people want to know is whether it is beatable. Wikipedia is about the dissemination of knowledge. In this case, the beatability question was answered 10 ten years ago by Wild Bill (the handle of a mathematician who posts on BJ21.com).

A how to guide? At no time have I written a how-to guide on counting cards. "Beating Pontoon" was a common-sense list of reasons why the game is countable; a "why" rather than "how".

5 Crad Trick edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can beat 21 but not pontoon, Tenzin Knows wheres its at! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.119.189 (talk) 10:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Steve Brown, Dosent like 20p Games and hates it when 2 or more players are in, If a harsh amount of money is lost heads or tails to regain 30p,

Josh wears a helmet :D

Tony carter hates it when we play cards, he also has stolen our 21!

who wrote this topic - Pontoon (card game)? the guy is not able to write a topic. edit

1) The person even did not mention the basic of this game, for example, the payouts for 777, 678, ...

2) Some people can write a very long topic to waste his/her and others' time, but can not think with common sense.

Add topic