Talk:Maged N. Kamel Boulos
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 March 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Deletion edit
This article has been deleted three times, including once following a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maged N. Kamel Boulos. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- How is this similar in any way to previous deletions?! Have you took the pain to do any simple human (or automated) comaprison of the text? Previous versions were deleted due to similarities to text at http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/maged-n-kamel-boulos/2/663/687 - Now, with this fresh version, how do you find the current entry text similar to http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/maged-n-kamel-boulos/2/663/687 ?! They are very different from one another. I hope moderators, editors and admins in this place are objective, human (not rushing for automated deletions without careful examination - take the time to READ and COMPARE!), and above all unbiased! Thanks! --Atomscolor1 (talk) 09:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- Having looked at the new article I agree that it's no longer a copyvio. Thanks for fixing that! However, I'm not completely convinced that Boulos is notable. Most of the sources currently on the article quote him talking about his work, but dont really constitute significant coverage; and I don't see any evidence of his meeting the points in WP:ACADEMIC.
- I hope it doesn't seem like I'm reflexively finding a new reason to object now that the copyvio's gone: I'm happy that that's fixed, and would be happy to be proved wrong on his notability. I'm just expressing my impressions after a careful, "human" examination of the subject. Olaf Davis (talk) 12:54, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Maged N. Kamel Boulos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110213224332/http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/staff/mnkamelboulos to http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/staff/mnkamelboulos
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)