Talk:Ma malakat aymanukum/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Coatrack
@Eperoton: As far as I see the article suffers from coatracky materials intended to make the article stand alone. Are you willing to help with trimming those issues? --Mhhossein talk 12:04, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Mhhossein Yes, per discussion Talk:Islamic_views_on_slavery#Merger_proposal, I was going to flesh out a section of Quranic context for this article and merge the rest of the coatrack material to Islamic views on slavery. The "Slaves and slavery" entry in Brill's Encyclopedia of the Quran would be useful here. This hasn't bubbled up to the top of my priorities yet, and I don't mind ceding initiative to any takers. Eperoton (talk) 00:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ma malakat aymanukum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160106101656/http://islamqa.info/en/10382 to http://islamqa.info/en/10382
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050215024937/http://www.al-islam.org/Organizations/Aalimnetwork/msg00224.html to http://al-islam.org/organizations/aalimnetwork/msg00224.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Rape
The article makes the unfounded claim that rape with a slave is allowed in Islam. This isn't however true, as Anas Ibn Malik says:
Malik related to me from Ibn Shihab that gave a judgment that the rapist had to pay the raped woman her bride-price. Yahya said that he heard Malik say, "What is done in our community about the man who rapes a woman, virgin or non-virgin, if she is free, is that he must pay the bride-price of the like of her. If she is a slave, he must pay what he has diminished of her worth. The hadd-punishment in such cases is applied to the rapist, and there is no punishment applied to the raped woman. If the rapist is a slave, that is against his master unless he wishes to surrender him."
The article is thus non neutral. --HakimPhilo (talk) 17:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
cut the taqiyya nonsense. here is the context of this disgusting dishonorable verse, as explained by ibn kathir:
"(Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess.) The Ayah means, you are prohibited from marrying women who are already married, (except those whom your right hands possess) except those whom you acquire through war, for you are allowed such women after making sure they are not pregnant. Imam Ahmad recorded that Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri said, "We captured some women from the area of Awtas who were already married, and we disliked having sexual relations with them because they already had husbands. So, we asked the Prophet about this matter, and this Ayah was revealed, (Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess). Consequently, we had sexual relations with these women." http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=684
in other words muhammad and his gang loved to rape and would even rape married women. allah allowed and encouraged them to continue their disgusting behavior. -- SJP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.108.220.167 (talk) 19:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ma malakat aymanukum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081128190241/http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/008.smt.html to http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/008.smt.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)