Talk:MAACO

Latest comment: 17 days ago by 75.110.14.132 in topic Maaco very unprofessional.

I have improved this page edit

Reformatted the entire page, updated to correct history and founders, replaced advertising section with "Maaco in pop culture".

Untitled edit

Looks like an ad. Williamb (talk) 06:15, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

copyright infringement? edit

I edited this page this morning. And now see a possible copyright infringement notice. I claim no such infringement. Please remove this notice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Was113 (talkcontribs) 15:12, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

no copyright infringement edit

yb the way, i wrote the last version and this morning's edit. there is no copyright infringment. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Was113 (talkcontribs) 15:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

No copyright infringement edit

As stated in earlier messages, I wrote the different versions of this article. They are in a neutral point of view and the facts are verified. I hold the copyright to this text and permit its use under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Was113 (talkcontribs) 15:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have improved this page. edit

I have improved this page. There is no copyright infringement on the copy or photo, but I am having trouble getting the photo to appear. Pelase help do this and also remove th enotice about poor quality. Thank you.--Was113 (talk) 19:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I have tried to incorporate the prose in an encyclopedic fashion. Let me know what you think. ScienceApologist (talk) 20:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bias? edit

Is the second external link the sort of thing an unbiased Encyclopedia article should have? I'll let you be the judge. http://www.rcp.ca/maaco.htm Garth 187 (talk) 22:25, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Actually, it looks like the link was added by the person who has a beef with the subject of the article. I think it clearly imposes bias and violates neutrality so I am going to delete that external link. Garth 187 (talk) 22:28, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Who Cares edit

As to the identities of MAACOs Lawyers? What does that have to do with anything, so I deleted it. Kaltenborn (talk) 00:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Typicalmaaco.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:Typicalmaaco.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:26, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Macco in Greenville north Carolina is very unprofessional. Its my worst experience so far. 75.110.14.132 (talk) 21:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Maaco very unprofessional. edit

The franchise maaco bodyshop in Greenville north Carolina is very unprofessional. Its my worst experience so far. I will never recommend this location to anyone. 75.110.14.132 (talk) 21:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply