Talk:M2020 tank
Latest comment: 15 days ago by DevonianShark in topic Suggest article name change
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Suggest article name change
editIn this video[1] from May 29, 2024, the official name of the tank appears to be confirmed as either "Cheonma-2", "Cheonma-20", or "Cheonma-22". (24:56-25:04)
Immediately after in the same video, censored information regarding the shells of the tank are shown, which appear to show one piece ammunition. This would suggest that the gun is either smaller than 125mm, or a new style autoloader, or the shells are manually loaded. Awhalen0601 (talk) 02:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the name should be changed 2A02:E0:A57E:6C00:1D73:241:7B8E:3A81 (talk) 07:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- It says <천마-2호>, Ch’ŏnma-2; Ho is after the 2 but it just means something like 'type' and shouldn't be part of the name. Agree that it should be changed – ideally to 'Chonma-2'.
- And yes, it's a manually loaded 125mm – 4 crew were shown in the training exercises in March. There's also no shell ejection port. I don't think it's claimed anywhere that the tank reversed back to the 115mm after the Songun. DevonianShark (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)