Talk:M1895 Lee Navy
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on M1895 Lee Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206050300/http://www.users.fast.net/~kragmeister/win-lee/index.htm to http://www.users.fast.net/~kragmeister/win-lee/index.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121103191821/http://www.history.navy.mil/library/special/contract02.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/library/special/contract02.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Charger-fed or en bloc clip-fed? edit
It first says it is "charger-fed" while talking about the design competition, then refers to the "en bloc clips" later on. These are not the same thing. A "charger" is a stripper clip, and is a totally different approach from an en bloc clip, which is loaded into the rifle with the ammo, a la Mannlicher or Garand. From the era, I'm guessing en bloc, According to Google, this gun doesn't actually use either type. It is a magazine-fed gun, and can be loaded with loose ammo, OR a full clip can be inserted...but it doesn't NEED the clip, which is just used to make it easier to load. So, it's closest to an en bloc, but doesn't meet the usual definition of it, which usually means that the gun requires the clip to fire as a repeater. I see some people claiming that this is because the clip has the follower spring integral with it, but this is not true for the Garand at least, and I'm not sure what rifles that is actually true of. AnnaGoFast (talk) 04:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)