Talk:M1-92

Latest comment: 1 month ago by NathanScientific in topic Classification change

Please confirm classification edit

The WikiProject classification for M1-92 is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  20:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M1-92. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Classification change edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

After expanding this article to over 500 words, I thought it prudent to change its status to Start-class. Being new to editing Wikipedia, I wanted to leave this message to notify the Wikipedia community in case I made a horrific mistake or left out something important. Looking at Wikipedia:Stub, everything seems to be all right, but if you would take a moment to double-check my work, I would greatly appreciate it. NathanScientific (talk) 21:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply