M. E. Clifton James is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
If anyone has access to the Press obituaries, it would be interesting to know what's said about his family. I know there was at least one son (Tony James) with whom I was friendly as a colleague in the readers' room at the Herald and Weekly Times, Melbourne, during the 1960s. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 03:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
Am I the only one who thinks it is a bit sad that the photograph on his page is of Montogomery? I think it would be better, and more informative, if there was one of Clifton James.
If no one objects, I will seek one out. 89.100.251.145 (talk) 21:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
The photo link (the genuine monty) is improper in that it does not link to the man himself but to a disambiguation page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.230.83.45 (talk) 18:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
There is a much better pictue on the page now. Let's hope it can stay. 89.101.208.222 (talk) 12:30, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
I would like to see more evidence that the picture is genuine and is not subject to copyright. A scan by unprovenanced user StripeyCat does not establish that user as the owner of the 70-year-old photo. A fair use rationale seems to be warranted. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 17:53, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
.svg)
