Talk:M-120 (Michigan highway)/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Admrboltz in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AdmrBoltz 00:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|hold}}  

Comments edit

  • Second Muskegon link in the Major junctions section should be unlinked per WP:OVERLINK.
  • Images would be nice, but are not a GA requirement. You may wanna include a copy of an old map for the previous routing of the highway. I would recommend the portion that links from Ohio Route 120.
  • "In the aftermath of the reroute, the M-20 designation was moved to run from Hesperia to New Era."
  • "That concurrency was removed in 1978." link concurrency.
    • "ran concurrently" in the previous sentence is already linked to that article. Imzadi 1979  00:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Passing --AdmrBoltz 00:48, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply