Talk:Lycium barbarum

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Zefr in topic Uncommon names

"Most common English name" edit

I'm not sure where the current information as to "the most common English name" has come from. It's certainly not the common name in the UK (where it's called Duke of Argyll's tea plant") or in North America (where it's called matrimony vine). MeegsC (talk) 22:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

This claim is unsourced; I've removed the whole paragraph which adds nothing to the article as it is. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:26, 11 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Lycium barbarum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Native Range Updated edit

I have updated the native range to China, from the plurality of existing references. No new references were added. The old reference can be reconciled if it refers to the present-day, naturalized range. Facial (talk) 00:17, 6 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Uncommon names edit

This edit and this revert were justified to remove a host of names either used in marketing or concocted by non-WP:RS sources. If we don't have rigorous secondary sources for such names, they don't need to be in the article. Zefr (talk) 23:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply