Talk:Luten Bridge Company

Latest comment: 12 years ago by SarekOfVulcan in topic Knoxville, TN vs. York, PA vs. Little Rock, AR

NPOV edit

  Resolved

I question the neutrality of this statement:

"However long it remains above the Dan River, Mebane's Bridge will serve as a monument to industrial ambition, cronyism, a countryside in transition, Judge Parker's most famous opinion, and one of the most bizarre and heated moments in Rockingham County's history."

Opinions greatly appreciated.67.142.130.18 (talk) 03:12, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Since the recent changes to the article by Drmies on 03:14, 16 November 2009, the statement in question is now no longer in the article. I am marking the dispute as resolved. Once again, opinions greatly appreciated. MMS2013 (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem removed edit

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=870459. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MLauba (Talk) 10:50, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Knoxville, TN vs. York, PA vs. Little Rock, AR edit

According to Documents/AR-67_Fourche_LaFave_River_Bridge_(01160).pdf this HAER document, the Luten Bridge Company was incorporated in York, Pennsylvania in 1909. And a branch was opened by D.H. Daugherty, c.1920 in Little Rock, Arkansas.

According to the National Register's NRIS database, there are bridges attributed to "Luten Bridge Co.", one or more to "Luten Bridge Co. of Little Rock", and also one to "Luten Bridge Co. of Knoxville, TN". The article currently states "Luten Bridge Company was a bridge building company based in Knoxville, Tennessee ...", but I don't see specific sourcing for Knoxville being the location. --doncram 07:44, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Further, editor SarekOfVulcan just removed "Putnam County Bridge No. 159, Co. Rd. 650 W. over Big Walnut Cr., Reelsville, IN (Luten Engineering Co.), NRHP-listed", with an edit summary that that firm name applies to an Indianapolis company. The relationship between all these branches or companies or spellings is not clear. Maybe it is all one company, with different names at different times and for different branches. SarekOfVulcan, could you please provide your information here. --doncram 20:06, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
SarekOfVulcan, you appear to be engaging in edit warring at Luten arch article and perhaps also here. If you have some issue, please discuss civilly at Talk page, rather than communicate imperfectly by edits and edit summaries. I accepted your removal of one slightly differently named item, but restored the list of works known to be works of Luten Bridge Company (most sourced to NRIS, one already in the article). It hardly improves the article to remove all the works of the firm. --doncram 20:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yes, Doncram, you are edit warring. Stop it. From one of the sources already provided, "The company was one of several in the country with the name “Luten Bridge Company,” all named after Daniel B. Luten, a professor of engineering at Purdue University who created and patented an arch-based design for reinforced concrete bridges." This is the Tennessee one. If you can't link the items to that particular company, don't add them.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:35, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
SarekOfVulcan, you have now twice removed a list of works attributed to "Luten Bridge Co." I restored it. My opening a question at this discussion page was not with idea that there were multiple firms, it was with idea that the firm might not be headquartered in Knoxville. You suggest something different. Your edit summary characterizing my view, in the article, was wrong. I edited the article in good faith and raised a different question than you understood, here.
I suggest we leave the list in, which is in fact attributed to Luten Bridge Company, and take some time to read up upon this. There is no urgency to this pretty obscure article I think; the only possible urgency is given by your attention to following my edits and perhaps to raise further difficulty in wp:AN discussion that is open.
I suppose another alternative is that other editors bent on contention will descend. :( --doncram 20:43, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
I have a better idea. Stop running database reports and dropping them into articles without verifying the contents.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I'll let you have that snide remark. But i was in good faith editing, I had no reason in advance to suspect any issue, i was simply building the long-standing article. Thanks for pointing to the sentence (perhaps plagiarism to state without source, perhaps copyright violation to use such a long quote?), which i see is on page 11 out of 32-page article downloadable from SSRN here.
Well, given that there are apparently multiple companies of this name (or small variations), then some reorganization is needed, I think. I think the current article needs to be expanded to be about all of them, or moved to be an article about Luten Bridge Company of Knoxville, Tennessee. I prefer the former, as the Knoxville one, notable, can be easily be covered in a section (the current article is short, no need IMO to split out the Tennessee one from a main article about all of them.
Also questionable in the article is "The firm built Luten arch and other types of bridges." which reflects fact that Arkansas 7/51 Bridge, perhaps or perhaps not built by the Knoxville company, is not a Luten arch bridge.
Sarek, could you answer my previous question about your Indianapolis info. --doncram 21:26, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Who's who in engineering, Volume 1. (And if you think that was stated without source, you need to work on your reading skills.)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

NRHP-listed bridges removed from article edit

 
Moores Creek Bridge, Florida, built 1925

The firm built Luten arch and other types of bridges. Works of the firm include:

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k "National Register Information System". National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. March 13, 2009.