Talk:Lulusar-Dudipatsar National Park

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Rzvas in topic Rzvas

File:Lulusarlake.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Lulusarlake.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Lulusarlake.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:09, 5 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lulusar-Dudipatsar National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Rzvas edit

@Rzvas: Care to explain this? Mar4d (talk) 15:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Galleries are not added per WP:GALLERY. Rzvas (talk) 16:04, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
WP:GALLERY says: "However, a gallery section may be appropriate in some Wikipedia articles if a collection of images can illustrate aspects of a subject that cannot be easily or adequately described by text or individual images". Mar4d (talk) 16:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
We don't need a gallery for this article as it is very easy to understand the subject without a dedicated gallery. It was perfectly living without a gallery until Willard84' edited this article and you thought of restoring his edits. Rzvas (talk) 16:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply