Talk:Lu Zhengxiang

Article history

This page incorporates the article begun by User:Adumoul at Lou Tseng Tsiang; see the edit history at that page. Paularblaster (talk) 23:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

adding pictutres

Dom Lou'wife was an aunt of my father. I've a lot of pictures of him.

I'm not able to add pictures in your text, but ask mee if you want some: pierre(dot)puffet(at)gmail(dot)com

an exemple here: http://gw0.geneanet.org/index.php3?b=blackbatsx1&lang=fr;p=tseng+tsiang;n=lou —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.217.140.26 (talk) 19:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lou Tseng-Tsiang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080314001601/http://www.stnn.cc:82/reveal/200708/t20070815_598309.html to http://www.stnn.cc:82/reveal/200708/t20070815_598309.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:43, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed Move to Lu Zhengxiang

Based on the Google ngram and a look at the most recent scholarly works on the period (e.g., [1], [2], [3], [4]), "Lu Zhengxiang" has become much more widely used than "Lou Tseng-Tsiang". I propose moving this page accordingly. SilverStar54 (talk) 19:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Going ahead and making this move, given that there have been no objections. SilverStar54 (talk) 22:27, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Lou Tseng-Tsiang and his wife Berthe-Françoise-Eugénie Bovy 02.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:09, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Lou Tseng-Tsiang and his wife Berthe-Françoise-Eugénie Bovy 02.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Transcription

It says in the note on the name that the Pinyin transcription is "Lùzhǐxiáng" (which seems unlikely given that the article title has "zheng" rather than "zhi") and that the Wade-Giles transcription is "Lou Tseng-tsiang" (which should in fact be "Lu Cheng-hsiang", as in this New York Times report or this Oxford Reference entry). The subject of the article did publish under the name "Lou Tseng-Tsiang", but I would guess that's a French transcription (it certainly isn't Wade-Giles). Since that's the version of the name his books will be catalogued under, it should definitely be included, and probably more prominently than in an inaccurate note. Somebody with better knowledge of these transcription systems than me should sort this out, because as it stands even I can see that it's wrong. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 17:37, 24 September 2023 (UTC)