Talk:Love the Way You Lie (Part II)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Calvin999 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk2me) 02:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply


  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  


Infobox
  • Add song artwork to this article
    There isn't one. It wasn't released as a single. Calvin 999 11:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Lead
  • "It features guest vocals from rapper Eminem." - State nationality of Eminem
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "It serves as the sequel to the 2010 worldwide hit single "Love the Way You Lie" - Put commas around "Love the Way You Lie"
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Background and composition
  • "...but with Rihanna as the lead vocalist, viewing things from the female perspective. - Change second part of sentence to flow better
      Done Calvin 999 22:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Add an audio sample of the song, which according to WP:SAMPLE needs to be less than 10% of the original recording and about 64kbps in quality
      Not done I don't know how to add audio samples Calvin 999 22:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Critical reception
  • "...Loud works the pop gizmos..." - Italicize "Loud"
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "It’s sick that all these battles are what keeps me satisfied,” she sings." - Put single quote around the lyrics
      Done Calvin 999 22:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "Chris Richards of Washington Post..." - Make it "The Washington Post"
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Live performances
  • "...singing an acappella version of "Love The Way You Lie Part II"." - Put "Part II" around brackets
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Credits and personnel
  • No issues
Charts
  • "...edition of the album, however..." - Make separate sentences
      Done Calvin 999 22:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
References
  • Reference 1 - The publisher should be AOL Inc.; you should only include the "work=" parameter when a work needs to be italicized (magazines and other written works are italicized only)
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Reference 2 - The publisher is "Mention"; work is "Toronto Sun", not "MTV"
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Reference 3 - The publisher is MTV Networks; "work=" parameter not needed in this source because it is not written work
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Reference 4 & 5 - Publisher is Sony/ATV Music Publishing; where is year 2010?
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Reference 6 - Publisher needs to be wiki-linked
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Reference 9 - "work=" parameter not needed
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Reference 12 - "work=" parameter not needed
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Reference 14 - Publisher is needed
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Reference 17 - Publisher is needed
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Reference 18 - Billboard is a magazine, so it should be italicized; publisher needed; fix date format to "yyyy-mm-dd"
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Reference 19 - Work and publisher parameters are needed
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Reference 20 - Not sure if it is a reliable source
      Done Removed. Calvin 999 22:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Organize references better (Ex: where it has "Reflist", make it "Reflist|2")
      Done. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply


OVERALL REVIEW

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. There are a few issues keeping this article from good article status. First of all, there are numerous minor issues which I listed below that are affecting the quality of the article. Also, many of the references aren't properly formatted. I will give you the general seven days to fix the mistakes and/or debate the ones you do not believe affect GA status. - Rp0211 (talk2me) 05:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oh, it looks like someone has gone through and made the changes that I was going to do..... Calvin 999 21:45, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I thought that all editors could participate on GA corrections. No one takes away your merit. But still there are errors to fix. VítoR™ get LOUD! 22:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
All comments have been addressed Rp0211. Is there is anything else that concerns you that I can amend? Calvin 999 22:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Since all of the issues have been addressed, I have decided to put this article in good article status at this time. I will work on uploading a music file for this article to add clarity. Congratulations and keep up the good work. - Rp0211 (talk2me) 23:20, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks :) Calvin 999 11:49, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply