Talk:Louder Now

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Name edit

I wrote that the name came from the song "What's it Feel Like to Be a Ghost?" because, y'know, there are lyrics in there saying "Louder now, Louder now." Someone changed it. Was I wrong?

On "7th Avenue Drop", a FUSE show where bands play songs from their new records before they are released, the band confirms that "Louder Now" came from "What's It Feel Like to be a Ghost?".

In their previous album there is a lyric "So Scream louder now..." I thought that's where it came from.

Well except for no that is not where it came from. I've seen the show. 67.142.130.17 04:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Kerrang! Review edit

There is a {{Fact}} template on the Kerrang! review of 5/5, yet in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums page it states:

The third bit is preferably a link to the actual review on an official page; it may also be a summary of the review located elsewhere (if the original publisher doesn't include it online). If there are no online sources, you may include no link at all.

And judging as the review was in a magazine, I do not think you will find an online link. So unless someone find an online link, I will remove the {{Fact}} template.

Fair use rationale for Image:Taking back sunday louder now.jpg edit

 

Image:Taking back sunday louder now.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Taking back sunday louder now.jpg edit

 

Image:Taking back sunday louder now.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Taking back sunday louder now.jpg edit

 

Image:Taking back sunday louder now.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Emo? edit

I don't think you could claim the album "emo", without any claim from bands itself on artist style. 82.29.5.215 (talk) 15:24, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Louder Now. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:59, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply