This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Under the heading "Personal life", the first sentence states "Salvador fathered 102 children and reputedly had 48 women" (emphasis added). "Had" not the word that should be used here; it is a verb that's used to show possession, and even when it is intending to show possession (e.g., "He had 48 cars" "...48 houses", etc.), it is less appropriate than a term like "owned". Was the editor who added this trying to say that Salvador was in actual relationships with 48 different women? -if so, over the course of his life, or all at the same time? -or that he had been intimate with 48 women during his lifetime? The statement raises more questions than it answers. If anyone can help disambiguate this, it would be appreciated; most of us don't have access to the source cited. Thanks. Bricology (talk) 20:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
