Talk:Loreauville, Louisiana

Loreauville Owner (talk) 23:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

General Comments

Please follow Wikipedia's guidelines when including or editing content. Commercial content (advertising or similar) will be edited or removed.38.104.31.146 (talk) 16:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Notable People

Edits to the notable people section should follow Wikipedia's guidelines. Discussion here for proposed edits to this section before making changes. " It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page." Wikipedia:Notability (Loreauville Owner (talk) 23:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC))

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Loreauville, Louisiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110923091816/http://www.iberia.k12.la.us/schools/feeder_school_information.htm to http://www.iberia.k12.la.us/schools/feeder_school_information.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Removing unreferenced material

Ken Gallager, I removed some material that you added in 2018-04. Your edit summary said: "if you only removed it because you thought it was unreferenced, it is in fact referenced". In fact, it is not referenced. As you discovered, the reference you added two years ago has no definition. As far as I can tell, for almost three years, your edits have caused the page to render with an visible "undefined reference" error.

There are other similarly-named reference definitions that do appear in the article, and maybe there was once a definition for this reference. As far as I can tell, there's not. After three years, it seemed best to just remove the long-unsourced text. Maybe you feel differently? -- Mikeblas (talk) 00:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)