Talk:Lord Borthwick
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lord Borthwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708084143/http://www.borthwickcastle.com/castle_history.html to http://www.borthwickcastle.com/castle_history.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Lord Lyon 1986 Decision edit
The decision has recognied firstly that the first two men previously thought to be the first and second lords of Bothwick were actually the same man with the consequence that the sebsequent lords need to be renumbered. See: The Scots Law Times, 3rd July 1987 (ISSN 0036-908X), Court of the Lord Lyon - Lord Borthwick, Petitioner, 2 June 1986, p.2-9.
However, the renumbering is a bit more complex as that same decision made clear that earlier claims were not only eroneous but fraudulent and those claimants should not be considered as part of the title and certainly not 'de jure.' The line properly descends from the Borthwicks of Crookston. (See: MacGregor, Gordon, "The Red Book of Scotland", Scotland, private, 2022, Ed. 3, Vol. I; pp. 960-976) ThomasFAnderson (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)