Talk:Longbridge plant/Archives/2013
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Took some liberties
The article that was there was completely off beam. It was about Austin most of the time not Longbridge. I've edited it harshly. Added some pointers for further detail post 1950, but they need expanding. Seems like a complelling article, the history of the plant can be grasped in a much more holistic manner than the history of Austin, BL, MG Rover etc.
Can we have a pic of the mini's off the Italian Job here please? thanks. 195.92.67.74 13:55, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Excellent job on pics, well done :) Nick Boulevard 80.225.165.14 19:40, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Thanks Nick :) Leonig Mig 13:34, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Please note workforce quotes 250,000 this is wrong it was 25,000 in 1960's and early 70's (I worked there 1970 to closure) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.107.120.74 (talk) 06:32, 20 June 2013 (UTC)