Talk:Long Hard Road Out of Hell

Fair use rationale for Image:LHROOH.jpg

Image:LHROOH.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Marilyn manson long hard road out of hell.jpg

Image:Marilyn manson long hard road out of hell.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. This book was awesome. very intriging, but it will gross yu out till the end. read it. and u will know what i mean.its a beautiful creation. -A.D.D. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.184.191.251 (talk) 18:53, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

This book was awesome. very intriging, but it will gross yu out till the end. read it. and u will know what i mean.its a beautiful creation. -A.D.D. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.184.191.251 (talk) 18:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Long Hard Road Out of Hell/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Homeostasis07 (talk · contribs) 22:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Another @MagicatthemovieS: review, which seem to be getting easier each time. There was a single typo; a dash fix; I changed Composition to Composition and style per the MOS; I removed a small quote that didn't really add anything to the casual readers' understanding of the topic; and I re-arranged a couple of sentences in the Music video sub-section: [1]; [2]. Other than those: perfecto.

• All images are creative commons, with exception of the audio file which is less than the 10% limit and has a valid fair-use rationale for this article.
• Prose is well-written and engaging, spare the single typo I rectified above, and all accurately transcribed from reliable sources.
• Earwig's tool showed no copyvio, spare the usual direct quotations.
• No disambiguation or external link issues found.

Happy to promote this. Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

Sources

• MARILYN MANSON: SNEAKER PIMPS "VERY CONFUSED INDIVIDUALS"Wayback (Manson Feud with Sneaker Pimps)
• MARILYN MANSON IS NO FRIEND OF THE SNEAKER PIMPSWayback