Talk:London Bridges

Earlier proposed move

• London Bridges → London Bridges (novel) —(Discuss)— pages are identical —Jvelez 21:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I've redirected that page here. Feel free to do it the other way around if you wish, though you should probably move this talk page there, in that case. -Patstuart^talk|edits 20:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Plot summary

Extensively chopped down the plot summary. I've read this book and it's not that detailed.--206.27.244.160 21:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

{{movereq|London Bridges (novel)}}

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move

As suggested below I have created a redirect from London bridges to List of crossings of the River Thames and added a hatnote there. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

---

London Bridges → London Bridges (novel) — "London Bridges" should be a redirect to List of crossings of the River Thames, as the primary meaning, although this should of course have a hatnote pointing to the novel. PatGallacher (talk) 18:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

• Oppose. London Bridges as a capitalised proper name refers to the novel (as opposed to London bridges). Anyone typing in or linking to "London Bridges" is more likely to be seeking the novel. Any possible confusion is taken care of by the existing hatnote. Station1 (talk) 01:14, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Comment "London bridges" (note capitalization) redirects here. Such subtleties of capitalization could pass many people by. PatGallacher (talk) 01:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

I wouldn't object if London bridges redirected to List of crossings of the River Thames, assuming an appropriate hatnote was added there. But I do think most readers understand capitalization, especially those who take the trouble to capitalize the B. Station1 (talk) 01:37, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

A set of terrorist attacks "to get the world's attention". To what end?

Without the "why" it's just violence... 217.155.151.38 (talk) 08:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC)