Talk:London Borough of Redbridge

Redbridge and Ilford

It should be noted that parts of Redbridge and Ilford are outside London, having Essex in their address. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Maurice45 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 31 October 2006.

That is a postal county anomaly. MRSC • Talk 15:58, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, they have Essex in their address, but they are still part of Greater London. The whole borough is included, despite some parts having Essex in their name. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gammondog (talk • contribs) 14:45, 10 December 2006.

No, Essex is not in the address. Only put in their due to ignorance or lack of education to the contrary. All of Ilford and Redbridge has been a part of London for 45 years.

Chadwell Heath

Isn't Chadwell Heath a district in Redbridge? The article would be improved by including Chadwell Heath in the districts section.--TGC55 (talk) 13:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Chadwell Heath is in Dagenham. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.10.87.105 (talk) 20:09, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Demographics

Planning to highlight demographic change (census data) and residents' reactions to it e.g. the work of Sophie Watson & Anamik Saha on educated 30-something British Asian nostalgia for the more multicultural Redbridge of their youth. Happy to discuss TrabiMechanic 23:29, 29 November 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheTrabiMechanic (talk • contribs)

Currently there is a particular focus on changes in 'White British' numbers. In line with census reporting I'd like to even out the emphasis. Planning to start a separate section to discuss responses to demographic change. TrabiMechanic 00:08, 30 November 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheTrabiMechanic (talk • contribs)

In the section on Ethnic and Religious Change, I cited a local community group blog post I myself authored. This is because the article about the subject in The Times is now behind a paywall (more on that at How does your garden grow?) TrabiMechanic 19:45, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Although this section may be useful insofar as the numbers are taken from actual surveys, I question the motives in highlighting demographic change within the borough. Although figures can be authoritative, the choice to present these particular figures would, I argue, go beyond Wikipedia's claims to neutral content. Particularly so with reference to Watson and Saha (2013). User9891, London.

Maps

When I click a link in a section entitled Maps I don't expect to be directed to a picture of a bus further up the page. Either provide real maps or omit the section altogether. --Oldontarian (talk) 18:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC)  Done --ClemRutter (talk) 13:53, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on London Borough of Redbridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150906090756/http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/LP2011%20Chapter%202.pdf to http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/LP2011%20Chapter%202.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101228050859/http://www.busmap.org/tt4/275.pdf to http://www.busmap.org/tt4/275.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on London Borough of Redbridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120104163437/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10074356 to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10074356
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728190317/http://data.london.gov.uk/documents/London-Borough-Council-Elections-2010.pdf to http://data.london.gov.uk/documents/London-Borough-Council-Elections-2010.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 6 December 2017 (UTC)