Talk:Logistics specialist
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 24.116.151.63 in topic 92 is not an MOS
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Logistics specialist article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
92 is not an MOS edit
You can really tell a Sailor who didn't serve as an IA or in a purple billet wrote this thing. If you Navy types are going to say something comparative about the Army, at least get it somewhat right. 92 is not an MOS, its a Career Management Field (CMF) for MOSes in the Quartermaster Corps, much like how 35 is the CMF for Military Intelligence and 18 is the CMF for Special Forces. The Navy LS (and before that SK) rating is roughly equivalent to 92A, 92Y, 92F and 92Z on the enlisted side since the Navy doesn't differentiate as much as the Army, Marine Corps. Anyway, I'm going to correct it by changing it to reflect what a CMF is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.151.63 (talk) 10:44, 24 February 2019 (UTC)