Talk:Local transport plan

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

[Untitled] edit

Amended to introduce a reference to the plans being statutory, and to clear up a misunderstanding about what constitutes material considerations in the UK land use or spatial planning system.

Though a UK transport plan prepared by a highway and local traffic authority is now put on a statutory footing, in the UK a transport plan wouldn't have to be a statutory document to be a material consideration for land-use planning decision-making.

The importance of any consideration depends entirely upon its being held to be a reasoned justification of a land use of spatial matter to which weight should attach in respect of the land use and spatial effects and/or requirements of an individual planning application. Members of the public may, for example, raise fresh material considerations during consultation on a planning application, and any person may raise their own material considerations during evidence at a public inquiry providing these fall within the scope of the reasons for refusal.

Isaacwatts

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Local transport plan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply