Talk:Local 58
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 8 July 2022. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Yaakovaryeh (talk · contribs) on 8 July 2022. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Untitled section edit
- In its current state, I highly recommend that this article receives a bit of TLC - most of the episodes section literally cites the videos themselves, rather than articles discussing them. Grammar needs tidying up too.--BrayLockBoy (talk) 15:23, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
I don’t think so 15:51, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
I added a lot more sources edit
I added three new sources that aren't videos, but instead websites. One of them is a podcast. Analog Horror, (Communicate) 15:11, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Analog Horror
Does this page meet WIkipedia guidelines edit
I'm not sure if this page meets the appropriate noteworthiness guidelines. To me, this page does not seem to be noteworthy or worthy of such a page01:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pokeswap (talk • contribs)
Should we get rid of the episodes? edit
The Episodes are directly sourced from YouTube,which (usually) isn’t reliable due to it being User-Generated.We should at least switch it to what Geography Now did and switch it to a sort of list of episodes still in the article. Danubeball (talk) 18:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- No, description of plot or episode content is primary sourced to the production itself which happens to be on youtube. The Youtube links are to an official channel which is therefore acceptable, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Would this be a good place to practice contributing? edit
I'm interested in learning how to contribute meaningfully to Wikipedia and am pretty well-versed in this topic. I think there's a lot to add, including secondary sources that have discussed & analyzed the project's impact. If I make sure I'm familiar with the basics of article contributions first, would you all say this is a good place to start/learn? Brosephene underscore (talk) 04:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Removing primary sources template message edit
With my edits last year, including references to secondary sources' discussion on the series' impact, I move this template be discarded. Brosephene underscore (talk) 16:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- I also think we can remove the "need for expansion" under Discussion & Themes. Brosephene underscore (talk) 16:29, 14 September 2023 (UTC)