Talk:Loading dose

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

THE FORMULA FOR BIOAVAILABILITY IS INCORRECT. SEE BIOAVAILABILITY FOR CORRECT FORMULA.

Useful. Thanks. edit

A nice simple explanation for a pharmaceutical layperson. Thanks contributors. 72.94.230.117 (talk) 15:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ditto. This is a great article, thank you! I appreciate the simple explanation, and example problem. 204.96.18.5 (talk) 21:41, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply


Could someone who knows how to edit add azithromycin to drugs that are usually given with a starting dose? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.131.83.97 (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merge edit

See: Talk:Bolus (medicine), thanks. --Bobjgalindo (talk) 19:25, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I disagree, coming from an experienced pharmacist - they are not the same. You can give a regular dose by bolus - i.e. a quick IV push over a few seconds, or slow IV push over 3-5 mins. Whereas a loading dose can be given as a bolus, infusion or in oral form.
Loading dose is to get treatment to therapeutic level quickly. Bolus is to get a drug into the blood quickly. They are certainly not the same. I will remove the merge template, on both pages. Cheers Lethaniol 19:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Merge - Decline edit

I honor your request to merge but I feel that loading dose and a bolus are two distinctly different things. Therefore I feel that we should keep them seperate. Perhaps linking the articles is a better idea Alin0Steglinski (talk) 08:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

i agree edit

i agree with this statement. because there is a huge difference between loading dose and Bolus. please cheak that out. thanks.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rabbihossain28 (talkcontribs) 21:27, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Loading dose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply