Talk:Live. Love. ASAP

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleLive. Love. ASAP has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 24, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:LiveLoveA$AP/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 18:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  


Infobox edit

  • No issues

Lead edit

  • LiveLoveA$AP is the debut mixtape by American rapper A$AP Rocky... Have the sentence end here to comply with WP:BEGINNING
  • Allmusic editor Andre Barnes dubs LiveLoveA$AP "the antithesis of conscious rap" and a "guilty pleasure" for hip hop purists.[1] Put general attitude of reviewers toward the album, not just one

Background edit

  • In August, Rocky followed with "Peso"... Specify year

Composition edit

  • No issues

Release and promotion edit

  • No issues

Reception edit

  • No issues

Track listing edit

  • No issues

Personnel edit

  • No issues

Release history edit

  • Make sure to include sources to verify all of this information

References edit

  • Put the references into two separate columns to make it more organized


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. There are some minor issues that are keeping the article from reaching good article status. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

RE:

  • All album articles on Wikipedia, particularly the ones passed through GA/FA, have the first sentence as is, with the release date and label at the end. Although there's nothing about external consistency among articles in any guidelines, I don't see what WP:Beginning says that it should be otherwise, and since it's a release, it kind of suits that subject of the article.
  • Revised reviewer statement.
  • Specified year.
  • Reverted editor who added "Release history".
  • + sep. columns. Dan56 (talk) 19:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
According to WP:BEGINNING, "If possible, the page title should be the subject of the first sentence." Therefore, in this instance, it should say what number of album it is and who it is written by. Rp0211 (talk2me) 20:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Doesnt "debut" indicate what number it is? Dan56 (talk) 20:23, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes, "debut" does indicate what album it is for an artist. Rp0211 (talk2me) 21:17, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Anything else? Dan56 (talk) 16:54, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Since all issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 17:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Live. Love. ASAP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Live. Love. ASAP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply