Talk:Litigation funding
 | The contents of the Litigation funding page were merged into Legal financing on 13 August 2021 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Litigation funding redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
February 2008 edit
Moved from Talk:Litigation Funding (UK)The websites linked at the end of the "Litigation funding" entry should be removed because they are links to commercial services that would seem to violate the rule that any links should "not be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to ... links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product." So if this is why the link added today was disallowed then the rule should be applied uniformly and fairly.
July 2013 edit
I have attempted to improve citations and general formatStephenodowd (talk) 16:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Edit removed - NPOV issue? edit
I recently noticed that Vannin Capital were mentioned in the Litigation Funding (UK) page (URL below) alongside Harbour Litigation Funding. I also noticed that the article linked to Harbour's website, but not to Vannin Capital's.
When I added a link to Vannin Capital's website to help users navigate to Vannin's site, it was removed a couple of days later. I was curious as to the reason for this, when Harbour's link remained intact - this seems like bias towards one particular company which goes against Wikipedia's NPOV policy.
The page in question can be found here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation_Funding_(UK)
Disclosure - I am a director of Vannin Capital's online marketing agency.
Mattfielding1980 (talk) 16:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Litigation funding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151121144155/https://www.invest4justice.com/how-to-succeed-in-crowdfunding-your-legal-claim/ to https://www.invest4justice.com/how-to-succeed-in-crowdfunding-your-legal-claim/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:04, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
New Info edit
Hi, I updated the page with some important information. Subject related specialized people were contacted and they agreed with the content. I am connected and interested personally in this update. If I need to fulfill any parameters please do let me know. Thanks DiamondDiana (talk) 22:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC) I read the discussion of merger and I'll try to prepare something after discussion with legal experts to see what is favorable. That's interesting. DiamondDiana (talk) 23:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Overlapping pages edit
The pages on Litigation funding (this one), Legal financing and Champerty overlap. Also 'litigation finance'. Room for at least one merger. 112.119.117.119 (talk) 07:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- I think that this page is redundant with Legal financing, and it requires significant improvement. I suggest revising the existing content for accuracy and relevancy, then merging this article into legal financing. I don't think it's worth the effort to try to organize and update the case law or policy and regulation sections, and suggest removing them as part of a clean-up prior to merger, but with an eye toward whether any of the content should be added to the regional content of Legal financing. Arllaw (talk) 18:21, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- I have done some clean-up, and have proposed merger. Discussion of the merger will occur on the destination talk page, Talk:Legal financing#Overlapping pages.