Talk:Lists of fictional species

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Buidhe in topic Requested move 15 January 2021

untitled comments from 2006 edit

It is linked from the Main Page at the moment, but I think this should be AfD'd as redundant given Category:Lists of fictional species. violet/riga (t) 08:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I second that. -Quiddity 19:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
I agree, it is a bit redundant —Minun Spiderman 14:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

untitled comments from 2011 edit

How can I add a relevant link to this page without it being deleted by a bot? --Dyga19 (talk) 04:25, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 15 January 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 03:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply



Lists of fictional speciesLists of fictional specimens – Instead of whole species, these lists mostly describe single speciess′ individuals. 5.59.53.17 (talk) 14:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC) Relisting. Jack Frost (talk) 07:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose The article seems to be q list of mixed individual specimens and groups of species. An article split might be necessary. Showiecz (talk) 12:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.