Talk:List of tallest buildings in Phoenix

Phoenix United Towers

I've never even heard of this, but I'm guessing Phoenix won't be the home of a 120 story building any time soon. I've deleted it from the article. MY COCK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.138.168.60 (talk) 00:14, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

FAA restrictions

No mention of FAA influence on building height restrictions here, which may make Phoenix the most vertically challenged city for its size in the U.S.A. San Diego has the same problem in that its airport is even closer to downtown and it is discussed on their page. List_of_tallest_buildings_in_San_Diego

   Rijkstra (talk) 01:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

I think this should be featured.

This should be a featured article candidate - Seems to have good skyscrapers - even if tallest building - 148 m (483 ft). Most cities with tallest building that height are featured! 68.99.241.179 (talk) 21:27, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Be nominated for FL-class.

This should be nominated for FL-class status - most FL-class articles of skyscrapers look like Tallest buildings in Phoenix article. This article is long enough to be considered FL-class, so any contributors nominate this for FL-class? (I've seen since this article was created, it showed only the top 5 or 10, it now shows top 26.) Someone must have significantly edited this article. 68.228.255.234 (talk) 16:30, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

When I complete this process, I will nominate it for FL status. There are some things here that need to be corrected first, and I also have at least three other Tallest Buildings Lists to consider nominating for FL status (St. Louis, Fort Worth, and El Paso). Zonafan39 (talk) 17:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of tallest buildings in Phoenix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081014092824/http://www.eastvalleytribune.com:80/story/108404 to http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/108404

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)