Talk:List of phylogenetic tree visualization software

Other packages to add

• HyperTree,
• CTree,
• TreeIllustrator
• MixtureTree Annotator

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of phylogenetic tree visualization software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721023225/http://www.ncbi.orthomam.univ-montp2.fr/phyloexplorer/ to http://www.ncbi.orthomam.univ-montp2.fr/phyloexplorer/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.phyloviewer.org/intro.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090819083843/http://bioinfo.unice.fr/biodiv/Tree_editors.html to http://bioinfo.unice.fr/biodiv/Tree_editors.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Other roundups of tree viewers and related software

Should compare this article to these lists to see if we've exhausted them:

• https://www.biostars.org/p/2438/
• https://www.biostars.org/p/1443/#1444

AABoyles (talk) 17:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Reformat table of online software?

Of the three tables on this page the first one, online software, seems the least well formatted. My suggestion is that we reformat it to match the other two tables with Name, Description, Citation as the columns. Only 1 entry has added license info so that doesn't seem very popular or useful. I suggest we drop that column. Any thoughts? XCalPab (talk) 12:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)