Talk:List of impeachment investigations of United States federal judges

Neutrality

The failure to remove Chase is far mnre disputable than this page acknowledges. It is not surprising that Rehnquist should be glad that Congress does not impeach for judicial murder, nor for other judicial misconduct; but can we have a reliable source, not a man, who (like Roger Taney) violated the secrecy of the court for political putposes? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 23:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Then again, there is this absurdity:

During his first term, Congress and the Jefferson Administration attempted to reign in or destroy the judicial branch of government through legislation and impeachment

Literate "authors" rein in, and the Jeffersonians did not attempt to destroy the judicial branch outside Federalist hysteria, then and now. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:54, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

This article is replete with errors great and small, so feel free to savage it with impunity. -Rrius (talk) 20:13, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

no it's not. Ericl (talk) 14:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Impeachment investigations of United States federal judges. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120926115720/http://www.ford.utexas.edu/library/speeches/700415a.htm to http://www.ford.utexas.edu/library/speeches/700415a.htm
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5uplZEskJ to http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/judges_impeachments.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Impeachment investigations of United States federal judges. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5uplUoEZt?url=http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Senate_Impeachment_Role.htm to http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Senate_Impeachment_Role.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/6468424.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/judges_impeachments.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Intro needed

This article really needs more of an intro. How does one impeach a federal judge, anyway? Curious readers want to know! Nareek (talk) 21:16, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

A massive reversion

I reverted a massive amount of work by an intern calling themselves “secret name101” The reason was that they removed a very large amount of material without replacing it before they got bored and left. So I reverted everything to just before they started. There is some good stuff that I removed and apologize, but the stuff that they removed was some historically significant events, and that is more important.

Innes NOT Innis

On 2023-07-31 I noticed a discussion in this article of "Harry Innis" with a link to "[[Harry Innes|Harry Innis]]". This included a citation to "18 Annals of Cong. 1858, 1860 (1808)." Checking there I found a discussion of Harry "Innes" NOT "Innis". Two other citations included the Innes spelling. I found nothing supporting "Innis". Accordingly, I'm changing "Innis" to "Innes". DavidMCEddy (talk) 15:17, 31 July 2023 (UTC)