Talk:List of equipment of the Philippine Army

Latest comment: 1 year ago by DistortedWizard214 in topic SIPRI Trade Registers as a source for equipment

Contested deletion edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because... it has been edited by plenty of other conributors ---- Aunva6talk - contribs 16:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Removing the TUAVs edit

The TUAVs mentioned for the Philippine Army are no longer operational as shown in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3CCd_JIXdM I'll be removing it from the list. Israformales (talk) 02:19, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

No PVAR or SOAR?--2601:642:4200:EEB7:DC96:4CB4:72CC:89C2 (talk) 01:07, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

PVAR and SOAR were tested, both not adapted by the Philippine Army. SOAR is being used by the Philippine National Police though. Phichanad (talk) 01:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA Squad Designated Marksman Rifle edit

Hey guys. I saw this post in Timawa Net that Government Arsenal Squad Designated Marskman Rifle was field tested and issued last year June 2015. GA Facebook page also say it's issued to AFP Special Operation Units. Is this true? If so can we add it on the list?

Btw. Are there any news on the weapons the GA is supposed to be developing, and have they already made this weapons available?

Godzilladude123 (talk) 18:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

No final confirmation yet if the rifle has passed testing and is already adapted in the field. Let's wait for that.Phichanad (talk) 02:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
It does say "for Issuance" since June 2015 [1][2]. Does it means it was already issued in June 2015? Godzilladude123 (talk) 17:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Wait for further confirmation first.Phichanad (talk) 06:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of equipment of the Philippine Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:52, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:41, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blogs are Not Reliable Spurces edit

User Xiaoling 22 and His Friends are really Ignorant. They used The Blogs Sources from MaxDefence Phil Blog and facebook which Is Unrelible Sources. And then they starting to attack me while im just doing my job to clean up the M16s and Others which they are Unreliable Sources. I really Fed up with these Two "Ignorants" keeps repeat again with their "Sources". This isn't how it works in Wikipedia.MSQ 228 (talk) 09:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

SIPRI Trade Registers as a source for equipment edit

Hello i came across the SIPRI armstrade registers out of curiosity and found that it had a list of almost all arms transfers to the Philippines since the 1950s. Would it be possible to use it for added credibility? Tho from what i can gather you need to generate and download the list since it isnt actually displayed on the sipri website itself. You can request for the trade register here https://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/page/trade_register.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firekiino (talkcontribs) 12:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

I did try to upload a generated version for 2022 SIPRI Trade Registers to Google Drive and use that as a reference in lieu to the SIPRI website itself. DistortedWizard214 (talk) 01:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:51, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:07, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply