Talk:List of civil parishes in Kent

Untitled

I think it is vitally important that a civil parish is understood. It is NOT the same as a village, and that is what most of the references here originally led to. The two differ, in that a village often has the same name as the civil parish, but the latter covers a greater area, and includes other settlements (villages, hamlets) within it. I am working on changing the articles, but this is going to be long task - and I fear that every other county has the same problem. I am attempting to make each article say:

• The parish:XXX is a village and civil parish in the XXX District of Kent, England. The parish is located [here should appear a general description of the location, eg north west of XXXX]. Within the parish are the [settlements] of YYY and ZZZ. The population of the parish is ..... include communications (railways, roads) passing through the parish
• The village: details of its size, shape, location (include distances from nearby towns etc); its church it is dedicated to St ...; and then other details specifically about the village.
• Other settlements within the parish: these should referenced to a separate article, so that the List of villages in (eg Kent) can have them included
• There is often a website for the civil parish not often one for the village specifically; likewise population figures are for the civil parish, not just the village

Peter Shearan 19:24, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on List of civil parishes in Kent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314043623/http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/997463.pdf to http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/997463.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110519082840/http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/151840.pdf to http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/151840.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110519082840/http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/151840.pdf to http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/151840.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120603173443/http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/924631.pdf to http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/924631.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071219002013/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10492051 to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10492051
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050205022045/http://www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/geographic_area_listings/administrative.asp to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/geographic_area_listings/administrative.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)