The title of this should probably be List of bibliographical materials on the potlatch, with the rider that "potlatch" in that title might be capitalizable in a contextual sense, but "the Potlatch" has never been capitalized in that way; the defininite article ("the") is needed, as without it the context would be "....materials on potlatching"; and while potlatching refers to the activity of the potlatch, it doesn't encompass the whole of the potlatch culture. It's not those components of the title that are troubling wiki-wise, though; bibliographies aren't usually article material, unless presented as a list, hence the suggested title change, or to a yet-more-appropriate title that I don't know the naming conventions well enough to propose properly.Skookum1 20:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
