Talk:List of ambassadors of Russia to South Korea

Merge

edit

Please see merge comments at Talk:List of Ambassadors from Russia to South Korea and North Korea#Merge. Also note proposed AfD. --Tenmei (talk) 17:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merge headnote removed per discussion and agreement. --Tenmei (talk) 03:11, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Saved threads from deleted talk page -- arguably relevant?
The followiong was copied from Talk:List of Ambassadors from Russia to South Korea and North Korea ... because the issue may arise again in future?
Merge

Conventionally, a merge proposal presents an argument in support.

  • Oppose -- IMO, the context is established by the unequal treaties which mark Korea's early diplomatic history. The representative treaties which were identified by the Korean delegation at the Washington Naval Conference (1921) include:

As shown above, the diplomatic "problem" created by two Koreas is addressed in a number of ways; however, China, Russia and the UK have accredited ambassadors in both ROK and DPRK. The decisions made in Beijing, Moscow and London inform my judgment in creating List of Ambassadors from Russia to South Korea and List of Ambassadors from Russia to North Korea. The same reasoning causes me to oppose a merge. --Tenmei (talk) 17:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the formats are similar. The crucial difference is that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation sends two different men with distinctly different credentials to the different capitals of the two Koreas. The early history of each ambassador's posting will be the same because each is heir to a history which includes the diplomatic relationship between the Russian Imperial government and Korea. --Tenmei (talk) 17:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Oppose per Tenmei. You convinced me.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:51, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
AFD

The reasoning which explains why I oppose a merge is also an explanation for the proposed deletion of List of Ambassadors from Russia to South Korea and North Korea. This article should be deleted. --Tenmei (talk) 17:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

the information should surely be somewhere, and what is needed is consensus on how many lists to have. I therefore removed the prod. If you want to send to AfD you can, but it would be better to decide this on the talk p. DGG ( talk ) 01:31, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Explaining Redirect
A. This should be deleted. I construe the agreement of Greatpumpkin above to encompass the AfD; but perhaps it would be better if I were to post the following at the top of the page?
  • {{db-a10|duplicates [[List of Ambassadors from Russia to South Korea]] + [[List of Ambassadors from Russia to North Korea]] as discussed on talk page}}
B. Alternately, Great pumpkin could post the following at the top of the page?
  • {{db-author}}
C. The creation of this article was simply a mistake, but if we assume that someone else may think about this issue in the same way, it perhaps is arguable for the page to become a redirect? As a redirect, this talk page will be saved. --Tenmei (talk) 03:08, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Initial establishment of diplomatic relations

edit

The following sentence was deleted here:

"Russo-Korean diplomatic relations were initially established during the Russian Empire and during the Joseon period of Korean history."

I don't understand this. I will search for explicit citation support. --Tenmei (talk) 17:05, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply