This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
A paid editor made contributions to this article, and has disclosed that fact on this page, therefore the paid contributions template is a matter of fact and does not require discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
According to the policy "if you place the Paid tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article." As a paid editor I'm not allowed to remove the tag myself, but if any volunteer editor thinks that the neutral point of view of the article is ok, they are free to remove the tag as told in the Template:Paid contributions instructions: "If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning."Jjanhone (talk) 17:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
I'm pinging previous editors of this article to come and evaluate if the Paid tag could now be removed or if there's still something that should be corrected. So hello and cheers Lepricavark, Mr.choppers, Mccapra, Axeman89, RafaelS1979. Jjanhone (talk) 16:22, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
I do not see anything that could be accused of being non-neutral. The article hatnote implies otherwise. Beyond My Ken, which sections do you find problematic? I see no problem with the talkpage note. Mr.choppers | ✎ 19:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
The hatnote implies nothing. It says -- quite accurately -- that a paid editor contributed to the article. The obvious, real-world conclusion to draw from this is that the article therefore needs to be closely examined for bias and promotionalism. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
