This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Neither have been adopted by the USN, but since we already include the Mk 48, should the various mods be included as well?
--Chrthiel (talk) 21:52, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
That's correct. The launchers have been given designations by the USN but not adopted. I suspect that since they were developed jointly by the USN for an export customer they should be included. The various models for each launcher would make this list to long. If a full article for each launcher is written it should go there. Two way time (talk) 17:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
File:Harpoon-block-II-launch.jpg Nominated for Deletionedit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
