Talk:List of United States Army installations in Germany

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 31.75.95.31 in topic Baumholder

Muenster edit

There was the 570th USAAG HQ in Muenster (Handorf), as well as other 59th Ordnance Brigade Units throughout the British sector. The 570th was truly a full US installation with tiny PX and tiny commissary. http://www.usarmygermany.com/Sont.htm?http&&&www.usarmygermany.com/units/ordnance/USAREUR_570th%20USAAG.htm There were US detachments (company size) headquartered in Menden and other places. http://www.50missile.com/index.php/units/69th-usafad — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.131.88 (talk) 22:05, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Untitled edit

WHY delete this? There are other pages like this that are shorterPronoun 18:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

If no one comes here about this being deleted, I'll take the AfD out in one week (June 23) Pronoun 17:42, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've closed the AfD. Note that the best place to dispute whether an article should be deleted is in the actual AfD discussion itself which the tag on the page links to rather than the pages talk page. Eluchil404 05:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Red Links edit

We should really try to create pages for the massive amount of red links on this list. If the bases dont have pages then the links should be removed.

Why the hell is the U.S. still in Germany? edit

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Christ.

-G

The US is still in germany because it has commands in europe as well as bases for troops stationed here to be shipped else where and airbases for a foothold to be sent out else where. Many of the bases are closing but a few stay open for those reasons. Shotmenot 21:38, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

NATO has Germany at its heart. As long as NATO exists, it is useful to have some troops there, to keep facilities ready in case of expansion. USA now have/has about 60,000 of all branches, down from over, 300,000 at the height of the Cold War.

Germany is also a useful staging point for points east.

Germany is now fully sovereign, and could ask them to leave. It doesn’t. USA came as conquerors, stayed as allies - once it was quite certain that Germany had changed, that is. 31.75.95.31 (talk) 14:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Cites for 2009+ closures? edit

The 2008 round of base closures was just announced. I have seen no information about the following supposed closures or expansions:

Last I checked, Wiesbaden was one of the enduring communities over here, which includes McCully and Dexheim. Also haven't seen anything about Baumholder closing, nor anything in Heidelberg expanding. I'm deleting the unsourced information, and it shouldn't be resubmitted without a source other than tentative plans announced in weekly post newspapers. Hzoi 11:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


German States (Laender)? edit

Shouldn't the states be mentioned???

Pay edit

Does Us pay Germany for these bases?Ovsek (talk) 17:44, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

No. Germany lets the US use these bases for free. Germany has some spendings regarding these bases mentioned here (http://www.bundeshaushalt-info.de/startseite/#/2013/soll/ausgaben/einzelplan/0802.html) but 56 Mio € is quite little compared to what Germany payed for these bases 10 years before. 132.230.150.44 (talk) 12:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Red links unnecessary edit

The red links are overwhelming, no one is creating articles for them, and they should be removed. -User:Derstacker —Preceding undated comment added 17:04, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Baumholder edit

Not mentioned at all, either current or closed. What is the status? 31.75.95.31 (talk) 14:41, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of United States Army installations in Germany. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:39, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply