Talk:List of Tool concert tours

Citing sources

You can't just claim that all of these guest musicians have appeared with Tool. You should cite where you got this information. Also, I believe it is important to cite when Tool played these cover songs that they have played.--King Bee 21:49, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Howdy King Bee. I'm working on it. I moved that table over from the main Tool page. --Hobbes747 22:05, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Guest Musicians

Just as an FYI, Lars Ulrich did NOT perform with Tool in their 2009 stop in Fairfax. I was at the show, no such thing happened. The show wasn't even on the 31st, it was on the 30th. So that is a little telling... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.91.242.229 (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Tool Concert Poster from July 21, 2002

Hey Tool Fans,

Own a piece of history of the concert at the Pepsi Arena.

http://www.oddtoes.com/concert-posters/02-tool-lk/

Thanks www.oddtoes.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oddtoe (talk • contribs) 22:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on List of Tool concert tours. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6Gudv4efY?url=http://www.toolband.com/news/letter/2001_09.php to http://www.toolband.com/news/letter/2001_09.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070910230433/http://sonybmg.com.au/news/details.do?newsId=20030829003571 to http://www.sonybmg.com.au/news/details.do?newsId=20030829003571
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060614111822/http://www.patmastelotto.com/529.0.html to http://www.patmastelotto.com/529.0.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606214953/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=74849 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=74849
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061109142143/http://www.highbias.com/reviews/20020811_live.html to http://www.highbias.com/reviews/20020811_live.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061020174805/http://www.decibelmagazine.com/features/aug2006/tool.aspx to http://www.decibelmagazine.com/features/aug2006/tool.aspx
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.distortiononline.com/content/index.php?showID=724

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Notability/unsourced content concerns

This article is terrible written, both in prose quality, content covered in charts, or the very large portions of unsourced content. Usually, I’d start by paring down the unsourced content, but doing that will cut it down to a bare bones skeleton article. Which is why I was just redirecting, because I think it’d be better if someone created a better article from scratch if we were to have such an article.

However, I’ve been reverted twice by the same editor - once saying they would add more sources - which is only half the problem and even that they didn’t actually do, and once without an edit summary at all. So I opened this discussion... Sergecross73 msg me 04:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Got to agree this article is pretty terrible. I clicked on it expecting something along the lines of the Nine Inch Nails page. Where do you start? Why does the lead mention, let alone focus on, Ticks & Leeches? The tour history stops at 1996 (!), and the less said about the guest musicicans section, the better. Nothing has really improved since the redirect was done three years ago, so I would support it being redirected again. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)